the chart below shows the GDP growt per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The graphical compares three countries among 2007 and 2010 on the growt of GDP per year. On the whole, percentage of every season there was escalation and regression from each states.
In tunisia, sequentially start from 2007 to 2010 this country had progress that goes down and stands in place, stood at 6.3%, 4.4%, 3.1% at the same time. In japan, instead the opposite which got periodic enhancement from 2%, 4.05%, 5.2%, the last 6.5%. In ecuador, there was uncertain of uplifted or declined and finish at 3.1%, 4.9%, 1.2%, and 2.2%.
The inference of Gross Domestic Product in tunisia, japan and Equador from 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010. there was advance and stuck in tunisia. periodically increased obtained by japan, that is fantastic steped-up. Therefore, erratic derivation and was climbed for ecuador, the inequality experienced is also very far away. last of all, from these charts, severally country can learn from its impression.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Arman Mansyur | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009. Write a report for university lecturee decribing the information shown below. Make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The table below shows the sales made by a cofee shop in an office building an a typical weekday. Summarize the information by selecting and reportig rhe main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- the chart below shows the GDP growt per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in japan and malaysia in this year. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nt from 2%, 4.05%, 5.2%, the last 6.5%. In ecuador, there was uncertain of uplifte...
^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...quador from 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010. there was advance and stuck in tunisia. perio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Periodically
...there was advance and stuck in tunisia. periodically increased obtained by japan, that is fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
...lity experienced is also very far away. last of all, from these charts, severally co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16883116883 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53333318538 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701298701299 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7632851082 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197540882647 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775778048347 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147668675944 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158241048984 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118740538493 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.