The charts below show the percentage of men and women in different weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts illustrate the percentage of England population divided by gender in disparity groups of weight from 1993 to 2002.
Generally, english men and women were increasingly overweight, especially the female population. In addition, the proportion of people who were dangerously obesed remained the same over nine years.
In particular, the obesity rate of the male population rose slightly by 5% between 1993 and 2002. Simultaneously, the percentage of english men who were overweight increased to nearly 50% in 2002, whereas that percentage of english male who had a healthy weight declined significantly to just under 40%.
Compared with the change in the weight of the male population, that of english female is quite similar. The proportion of women who gotten obesity and those who were overweighted also experienced an increase trend from just over 10% and around 48% to just under 20% and almost 50% respectively. There was a dramatic drop in the figure of women whose weight is considered to be healthy, about 9%, which is just as same as the trend of the men population.
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 61
- Newspapers have an enormous influence on people’s ideas and opinions. Why? Is this a positive or negative situation? 78
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003. 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13407821229 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94758260078 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3876491239 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170810477312 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844288936132 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721432544387 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126596959776 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790087348968 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.