Discuss whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people life and work.
Surely, there has been no time history where the lives in of people have changed more daramatically.A quick reflection on typical day revels discuss design of building has been the one of most prominent topic in the contemporary discussion people have always been intrigued to analyze and explain regarding this I would say.
To begin with, there is myriad positive impact of modern building. Firstly there is good infrastructure motivation them to work harder with full dedication. As a case in point, performing work in good environment and safe of many disease. It is gives the more experience for building works and daily meet with new officers and workers. Thus needless to say, all these associated merits of a building will have a far reaching positive effect is comes to one psychological need.
Moving farther, modern building provides proper privacy to employees and good privacy. And gives the more experience of make artificial design of building. beside , unlike the electric light and air conditioner air, the maximum touch of natural sauces keep away in inevitable disease which are immensely important of the people.
To conclusion, that the design of a building enables people to stay healthy and safe, and merits associate with this are indeed to great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-18 | Nobal hundal | 80 | view |
- Impact of television shows on society 77
- Air travel can benefit the richest people in the world. ordinary people can get no advantage with development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 72
- Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind. 55
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in life. Agree or disagree? 55
- Discuss whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people life and work. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... people have changed more daramatically.A quick reflection on typical day revels...
^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amatically.A quick reflection on typical day revels discuss design of building ha...
^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun disease seems to be countable; consider using: 'many diseases'.
Suggestion: many diseases
...ng work in good environment and safe of many disease. It is gives the more experience for bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ily meet with new officers and workers. Thus needless to say, all these associated m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Beside
... of make artificial design of building. beside , unlike the electric light and air con...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ke artificial design of building. beside , unlike the electric light and air condi...
^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...safe, and merits associate with this are indeed to great to ignore.
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h this are indeed to great to ignore.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, regarding, so, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 209.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16267942584 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75618866621 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641148325359 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.3255676063 50.4703680194 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292337862699 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909830903703 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579383210091 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14691257436 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643514642872 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.