tpo36-integ writing
Both the reading and listening parts offer two opposite views on the effectiveness of cloud seeding. While the passage presents some clues that cloud seeding can be effective for the reduction of damage caused by hail, the professor lists the contradictory to these specific clues and presents some facts which call those clues into the questions.
First of all, the text mentioned to the effectiveness of cloud seeding in the laboratory experiments, which prevents the formation hail and converts it to the snow, and concluded that the same event could be repeated in nature. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the accuracy of this conclusion. As she asserts, the silver iodide does work differently in nature; furthermore, it prevents any types of precipitation. In so doing, by cloud seeding in nature, there will be no snow, rain, and hail. Consequently, by the cloud seeding, plants and crops will face another severe problem of drought and lack of water.
Secondly, meanwhile, the reading section refers to the effectiveness of cloud seeding in some countries of Asia as evidence of its impact's validity, the instructor, on the other hand, denies this piece of evidence too. As she posits, since this event happens in the urban areas of Asian countries, it will not work identically in the farmlands of the United States. According to the lecturer, the air pollution of the urban area is helpful in the prevention of hail's formation; however, the seeding cloud is aimed to be used in the agriculture lands which is unpolluted. Therefore, there is no warranty the same reaction will be duplicated in the farmlands too.
Finally, the passage gives examples of some local studies which the cloud seeding was effective. On the contrast, the rejects its accuracy too. As she explains, the reduction of hail on that period occurred simultaneously in some neighborhood areas such as the north, south, and east where do not use the cloud seeding effect. Thus, this reduction of hail precipitation has occurred for the sake of natural variation of local weather rather than could seeding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | jeffhjz | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | bijan54 | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | alta | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | zizi.dream | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | zizi.dream | 3 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of Butler Manufacturing."During the past year, workers at Butler Manufacturing reported 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefits more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 70
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 66
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a sign 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most businesspeople are motivated only by the desire for more money 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 344.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09593023256 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8086856684 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520348837209 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8133757217 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.866666667 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.