Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some
people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying
out, while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In these contemporary days, preserving animals is growing concern the world faces today. Some people conceive that nations and people should focus on creatures from vanishing; albeit, we ought to focus on current obstacles of mankind. The trend is contentious and holds bilingual perspective. Thus, prior to my opinion, both the views are discussed further before giving my opinion.
Elucidating the former viewpoint where protagonists are put their view, the most obvious reason is that animals may help to improve scientific research and advanced medical. As, animals play a crucial role in these field and rather than experimenting on human being it is an appropriate way to use animals. Furthermore, some animals can assist citizens to earn huge source of money. This is to say that farm animals help to earn money by selling product such as; cheese, milk. Apart from that, animals teach us unconditional love and loyalty. For instance, animals provide best motivations to human to achieve goals according to wildlife survey. As a result, people ought to protect animals.
On the other hand, those who favour in latter view have their own perspective. The significant one is that dearness and extreme destitution are being increased. As, people should focus this situation because it may adversely affect to the country's economy.consequently layman should maintain these situations.eventually, it will help to improve these issues. Additionally, mankind must focus on education rather than concerning about animals. To explicate, nowadays, some toddlers might not achieve education which plays decisive role in individual's life.so that, they must focus on litracy and making more and more education institutes, and universities.
To conclude and render my opinion, I assent to the former view because of we should preserve animals which are beautiful gift from the good and human and animals are dependent on each other; however, other side of view should not be neglected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-19 | Gautam Kothiya | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | Gautam Kothiya | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | Gautam Kothiya | 84 | view |
- . Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Somepeoplesaythatcountriesandindividualsshouldprotecttheseanimals fromdyingout,whileotherssayweshouldconcentratemoreonproblemsofhumanbeings.Discussbothviewsandgive youropinion. 84
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Somepeoplesaythatcountriesandindividualsshouldprotecttheseanimals fromdyingout,whileotherssayweshouldconcentratemoreonproblemsofhumanbeings.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion. 84
- University students often focus on one subject. However, some people think that universities should encourage to learn a range of other subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Somepeoplesaythatcountriesandindividualsshouldprotecttheseanimals fromdyingout,whileotherssayweshouldconcentratemoreonproblemsofhumanbeings.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion. 89
- Line graph 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 566, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'provide the best'.
Suggestion: provide the best
...love and loyalty. For instance, animals provide best motivations to human to achieve goals a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 64, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because we' instead.
Suggestion: because we
...my opinion, I assent to the former view because of we should preserve animals which are beaut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, apart from, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42258064516 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98076560293 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603225806452 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9005688942 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8823529412 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0839717947652 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269283681526 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296794687519 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0507863972225 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263086427789 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.