The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart depicts the comparison of families between owned and leased accommodation in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011.
Overall, during the first half of the period, the percentage of households renting accommodation was much higher than that of those owning their home. However, 1971 was a real game changer when an opposite trend was observed in the next 30 years (1917 - 2011).
Looking at the chart in more details, in 1918, families in rented accommodation accounted for more than 75%, triple that of those in rented places. This figure dropped dramatically to 50% in 1971 despite a period of stability from 1939 to 1953. By contrast, the proportion of households owning accommodation doubled appreciably, with the figure standing at just under 25% in 1918, remaining stable at around between 1939 and 1961, before rising to equal to those in rented accommodation.
From 1981 to 2011, households in owned accommodation continued its rising trends and reached a peak of nearly 70% before dropping by 5% in 2011. On the other hand, the proportion of tenants saw a different pattern when experiencing a gradual decline to just above 30%, followed by a small increase by 5% in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Ji Due | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Loi Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aria etemadi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being acused of the crimeSome lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 84
- Some people believe that we have too many choices these days. To what extent to you agree or disagree?To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant’s past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime.Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be cha 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0351758794 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83151902695 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587939698492 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7784334316 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264494134066 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117214255806 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101834604497 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178583140438 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09564551661 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.