Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
“What is an art”? Or How to define an art? Research has shown that it is inexorable to culminate the footsteps of art in other related and non-related fields such as arts can be related to movie making, specific style of cooking or even landing an unmanned spaceship onto a moon. The corollary is what can encourage art and what can affect the probity of art. The prompt presents a controversial view on art supporting by government funding, if it can lead to flourish and accessible to all people or it can affect the integrity of it. In my view government support severely affect the probity of art. The reasons that are supporting my view are presented in the following paragraphs.
First of all, arts as defined by research from the ancient time has inherent or gifted by God to very few people. Therefore, it cannot be nurtured by any sort of support. For instance, the famous painter of India, Mr. Hussain has been pursuing painting since his childhood when he was 6 years of age and then he phlegmatic about what art is. Had government funding come in the consideration, it would have been difficult for him to meet the standards set by government for a funding and he would have been forced to amend its talent as per government requirement. Further, the toy makers in Channapatna, a region in India, famous for handmade toys have carried on this art from one generation to another. In this case as well, had government intervened, they would have forced to develop toys as per sales, market, can future capital requirement which would have led them to completely forget their traditional art. Both the cases show that support by the government can hinder the growth and probity of art. It matters because it is the inherent skills which made them popular and could have been curtailed with government funding.
Secondly, government funding comes with censor regulations therefore affect the art of dancing and singing. For instance, the famous Boogie Woogie TV dance show would have been succumbed to censor regulations had it supported by government funding since many of the dance forms such as Jazz and B-Boying were considered to be infelicitous by traditional Indian customs. Further, the upcoming and lately, the popular singing sensational rappers like Mr. Badshah and Mr. Honey Singh would have not allowed their persuasion of rapping beating all box office records and produced worldwide tracks had government supported them since both of these rappers are used to have some words which are considered solecism as per government funding guidelines. Both the instances justify that government funding impetuously affect the natural probity of an art. It is appreciable since the art can be flourished in any direction but government funding restricts the erratic behaviour.
Thirdly, some arts are devolve from one generation to another therefore must not be funded by government since research has shown that it would curtail its wings. For instance, the worldwide famous logistics, Mumbai Dabbawala, art involved in receiving and delivering the lunch box on time with accuracy irrespective of any weather or situation would have led to its unwarranted transformation to a company had it support by the government since it requires that any commercial setup be it art, if funded by government, must be a company and follow corporate regulations. With this approach, this logistics art would have not been a case of management in all business schools around the world. Further, the art of making home furnishings by Godrej would have not been popular and cherished if government intervened since it would have led them to comply home safety requirement and environment guidelines etc. Both the examples prove that government funding led to circumscribing the probity of art by discouraging it natural progression. It is significant in order to have an art which can reach to sky without any limitations or restrictions.
Of course, some would argue that had government intervened these arts could have been accessible to the larger masses. However, as many researcher had proved that art cannot be nurtures therefore cannot be curtailed by any restrictions, therefore, it must be restricted to aesthetics only leaving the large masses. In conclusion, art is something which should not be accessible by any neophyte or dilettante, therefore it does not require any funding by the government, otherwise it would compromise its probity.
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 66
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 66
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in 69
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based o 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'devolved'.
Suggestion: devolved
...ic behaviour. Thirdly, some arts are devolve from one generation to another therefor...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'supports'?
Suggestion: supports
...nted transformation to a company had it support by the government since it requires tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 132, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun researcher seems to be countable; consider using: 'many researchers'.
Suggestion: many researchers
...sible to the larger masses. However, as many researcher had proved that art cannot be nurtures ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, for instance, in conclusion, of course, sort of, such as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 31.0 12.4196629213 250% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3744.0 2235.4752809 167% => OK
No of words: 731.0 442.535393258 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12175102599 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.19971265256 4.55969084622 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89348151009 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 317.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43365253078 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1162.8 704.065955056 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.515770443 60.3974514979 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.103448276 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2068965517 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79310344828 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377099971456 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134372594327 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661164384559 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252220135847 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366115427941 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 100.480337079 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.