The line graph gives information about the number of visitors to two different music websites: Pop Parade and Music Choice in 15 days. As it can be seen in the graph, the number of visits to Pop Parade is higher than that of Music choice. Otherwise, there was a sharp fluctuation in the number of access times to Pop-parade during the time.
Pop Parade website had 120,000 access times while Musical Choice only received one-third of its views. At the end of the period, Pop Parade gained estimated 170,000 visits in comparative with 70,000 access times in Musical choice.
Without regard to this, the figure of visits at Musical Choice increased exponentially between day 2 and day 3 while that at Pop Parade remained steadily overall. In contrast, from day 5 to day 9, the number of visitors to Music Choice experienced a wide fluctuation between 20,000 and 40,000. Both of the websites’ visitors then hit their highest number of 150,000 for Pop Parade and 120,000 for Music Choice.
- The pie charts below compare the water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 84
- The pie chart shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990 36
- The main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 61
- The pie charts show the main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 61
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s times to Pop-parade during the time. Pop Parade website had 120,000 access ti...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0,000 access times in Musical choice. Without regard to this, the figure of vi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89349112426 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59037819084 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.4743420942 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.375 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210857561016 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107477702648 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793608840555 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148787491335 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028290929593 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.