The graph shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
The given line graph illustrates the information about pollution due to smoke and Sulphur dioxide in London from 1600 to 2000. Unit of measurement is micrograms per cubic metre.
Overall, the level of Sulphur dioxide was overwhelmingly tripled as compared to smoke in the environment in the middle of the period while the figure was dramatically reduced at the beginning level at the end of the period.
In 1600, the level of Sulphur dioxide and smoke was nominal in the London while there was a significant hike in the level of Sulphur dioxide accounted up to 800 micrograms in comparison with only 230 micrograms of smoke in the year 1725. After a slight decrement of 50 micrograms, the figure for Sulphur dioxide peaked at 850 micrograms in 1850 and a similar trend was also observed in case of smoke about a peak of 450 micrograms in 1875.
However, the level for both was greatly started to plunge from 1875 which further fluctuated between 200 to 400 micrograms up to 1920. Ultimately, the pollution level was appreciably diminished near to zero by the London authorities in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The flow chart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students. 78
- The line graph shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from. 73
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labor. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that developed countries have higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment. Discuss both these views 73
- Walking is known to be beneficial for health and yet fewer and fewer people are walking these days What are the reasons for this What can be done to tackle this problem 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90322580645 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80599839788 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521505376344 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.429214926 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234722272102 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124206709489 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113473490798 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159449338353 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836830973929 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.