Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
As the century draws to close, gender issues such as inequality has become of profound importance. Although some top ranked universities have strict norms regarding the reservation of seats based on gender, this ratio tend to vary according to subjects in most universities. This practise is clearly demeaning the importance of equality among gender and I agree to the fact that a paradigm shift in education which provides equality in the intake of both the genders should be adopted.
Admitting varying numbers of male and female students in an institution can be erroneous for myriad reasons. For instance, when less number of girls are preferred for a particular course, it can lead to a classroom environment in which boys dominate in taking decisions regarding classroom activities. Therein, it affects in the healthy classroom relationship between the students.
However, if a balance is stricken between the ratios of these two genders, it can be beneficial. When equal number of male and female students learn a particular subject, it eliminates the chances of one gender dominating a specific field. Apparently, it also supports the notion of feminism.
On the other hand, it will also contribute in improving certain fields by combining the gender specific abilities of both the genders. For example, women having a detailed grasp on the emotional intelligence and men being more predominant in the reasoning skills, they together can work on projects such as artificial intelligence and robotics. In addition, it also breaks the phenomenon of glass ceiling, this in turn helps every individual to excel in their academics and occupation regardless of their gender.
Therefore, it can be concluded that from the aforementioned points it is crystal clear that only if we provide a equal space in an educational setting, the sense of equality can be expanded to other dimensions of job and society. So, political action should be implemented to ensure same ratio reservation for both male and female students.
- The burning of oil for transport especially in private cars is wasteful and environmentally irresponsible Taxation on petrol and diesel fuel should be increased to very high level to discourage the use of private cars To what extent would you support or r 76
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 11
- THe tables and pie chart show in percentage terms the results of a survey of a new shopping complex in Aukland, NEw Zealand.The tables and pie chart provide an overview of people's opinion in Auckland, New Zealand about the new shopping complex. 67
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent you agree or disagree with the statement?You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s crystal clear that only if we provide a equal space in an educational setting, ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96033842662 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59133126935 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9480396045 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130693740189 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441246517563 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461648286972 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746475691358 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243221484254 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.