It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle subsequently our behavior with environment has undergone profound changes and became more sophisticated as well as destructive. By this definition, the swift and monumental scientific and technological achievements caused abused and over-used from our natural resources which endangered wildlife. Therefore, the government should promptly take a policy sooner rather than being later for the protection of wildlife. the following essay takes an elaborating look at how it is feasible and does it a big concern to allocate striking budget.
there is no denying that we are in co-existence with our surrounding including woods, oceans, wetlands, agrarian grounds, wildlife, and atmosphere. Hence, the preservation of these vital(biotic)elements must be at top priorities of every government. As these factors are bond to each other like the chain so a failure in each one hits the order among the system. for instance, if a lake dries the whole bio-system would destroy. The Urmia Lake would be an ideal example here. in fact, the creation of immethodical dams on revers ending to this lake is the major reason for the extinction of this ecosystem. this phenomenon is threatening millions of people neat that location and also the agriculture and industry.
admittedly, forgetting the favors that nature did for us is a kind of injustice. in fact, the life on the earth not belonged for us, as our ancestors saved it for us it is our duty to do so. assuredly, the effects of abuse from natural resources not will appear in the future, we are now are tackling with environmental problems. global warming is turned into a serious challenge for the governments that put the public health on danger and takes the earth to the verge of warning point. just take the greenhouse gases that plentifully releases into the atmosphere causes skin and respiratory diseases.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that preserving our environment is not an optional matter, it is actually an obligation. the alarm of ecological threats has been sounded, so taking urgent action is required.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Successful leaders should make others part of the decision-making process. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should buy things that are made in their own country, even if the price of these products is higher than that of the products made in other countries. 90
- 58. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people's lives have already taken place. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To remain happy and optimistic when you fail is more important than achieving success 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People should take time to relax with hobbies or physical activities that are very different from what they do at work. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...g later for the protection of wildlife. the following essay takes an elaborating lo...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...concern to allocate striking budget. there is no denying that we are in co-existen...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ch one hits the order among the system. for instance, if a lake dries the whole bio...
^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ia Lake would be an ideal example here. in fact, the creation of immethodical dams...
^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...n for the extinction of this ecosystem. this phenomenon is threatening millions of p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Admittedly
...d also the agriculture and industry. admittedly, forgetting the favors that nature did ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ture did for us is a kind of injustice. in fact, the life on the earth not belonge...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...t will appear in the future, we are now are tackling with environmental problems. g...
^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Global
...e tackling with environmental problems. global warming is turned into a serious challe...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Just
...he earth to the verge of warning point. just take the greenhouse gases that plentifu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...l matter, it is actually an obligation. the alarm of ecological threats has been so...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, hence, if, look, so, therefore, well, for instance, in fact, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17777777778 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08382878902 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622222222222 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0111095683 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130060840386 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381141018361 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456857286831 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703341270523 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051194067709 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.