The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
The pie charts compare six places in the earth in term of different ways to use water. Overall, spending water for agriculture accounts for the largest proportion of almost areas. However, North America and Europe prefer to employ water for industrial.
Regarding to North America and Europe, most water consumption was used for industrial which comprises a haft, 48% and 53% respectively. In term of agricultural use, the figure for the North America is slightly more than that of the Europe, which is about 7% higher. The percentage of spending water for domestic is lowest in both nations, just nearly 14% of total.
Most water in the other regions is for agriculture, with the highest figure belonging to Central Asia, at 88%. Spending water for domestic is quite larger than industrial in three nations (except South East Asia), with accounting for around 7% to 19%. In contrast, South East Asia uses more water for industrial, which the figure for domestic was equal 7% with Central Asia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Fedkin | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Fedkin | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 78
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007( you can search google for seeing the picture) 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03012048193 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56111962244 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560240963855 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0979860543 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.7777777778 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278577053939 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134593467213 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561015751153 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208078345486 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638854671043 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.