advantages and disadvantages af allocating tzx to unhealthy products
The reading passage and lecture both discuss the consequences of imposing high taxes on cigarette or other unhealthy products. The reading mentions that this policy has many social benefits but the lecturer claims that it can be really challenging.
First, the reading makes an argument that these extra taxes discourage people from indulging in unhealthy behavior that is conducive to buying fewer of them. Although, the professor states that not only they never stop buying it both also they will buy cheap and low-quality materials. Further more, these cheap materials are really harmful to their health like buying unhealthy food than healthy food.
Second, the reading mentions that these taxes are really fair because when they become sick they should pay much money for medical costs and others people do not contribute equally to covering these costs. Whereas, the speaker states that this method is unfair. Because the people who buy cigarettes have different incomes. The tax is great for low-income people but is not considerable for rich people.
Third, the reading claims that this policy increases the government's revenue and it can be used on medical assistance and public project like building stadium or park. However, the lecturer declares that this policy increase dependency of government to tax and it will stimulate the government to implement other policies to enhance it like banning smoking in public places or private house.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | sefeliz | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | 宋致遠 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | Simin_MB | 65 | view |
- companies should hire their employees for a small period than entire life 73
- knowing events around the world is relly important 71
- in the past it was easier to identify what kinds of careea have successful future 3
- in the past it was easier to identify what kind of career lead to a prosperious future 3
- when treachers assign project that students must work together , the students learn more efficiency that when they are asked to work alone 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ribute equally to covering these costs. Whereas, the speaker states that this method is...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...aker states that this method is unfair. Because the people who buy cigarettes have diff...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...g claims that this policy increases the governments revenue and it can be used on medical a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29437229437 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45245641268 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593073593074 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9234974436 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.181818182 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0314439668814 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0137265092319 0.0996497079465 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0225170797042 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0209093038981 0.162205337803 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212401631064 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.