Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of teaching by experience and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of effective learning is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that teaching methods can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, being effective in formal learning can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of practical learning, as well as compulsory education, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered experienced teachers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both formal learning and conducting experiment apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, influence of books on learning might increase the consequences of learning possibilities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of education facilities could relate to this reality that the demerits of a lack of experience pertain to professional teachers. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of active learning is correlated negatively with education improvements. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of learning skills.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of experimental learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educated people prove the significance of online teaching, but also pinpoint education institutions implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | manraj123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | shiva_tootoonchi | 88 | view |
| 2018-10-31 | bashirheidari | 85 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | IZAD | 88 | view |
- it's difficult to maintenance the balance between work and other aspects of life such as family and leisure time, what is your opinion to keep it balanced. 85
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 88
- it's difficult to maintenance the balance between work and other aspects of life such as family and leisure time, what is your opinion to keep it balanced. 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 88
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82490272374 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34412199275 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645914396887 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0009469595 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209953033014 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671852585703 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487763292333 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109510584778 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543694881125 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.