Students should fund their education with part-time work that they do while they study.
The development strategy of a Country is determined by its literacy rate as the future of our nation is dependent on our posterity, it’s our responsibility to nourish this younger generation and make them precocious. Allan Boom rightly said- “Education is the movement from darkness to light”. Egalitarianism forms the basis all law and principles today, hence education should be made available to everyone without any impediments.
Children under age of 18, should be persuaded to learn, analyse rather than doing work. Since, it’s their tender age in which they grow mentally and physically, forcing them to do part-time job might cause burden on them. Till 18, parents should financially bulwark them, it’s an investment that would give greater profits not only to them but also to the nation in the future. For those, who have meek pecuniary status, government provides several merit-cum-means scholarship that they can avail.
Contemporarily, students in pursuit of higher education at universities abroad might have to do part-time jobs. As the general saying goes- “Every coin has two sides”, this has its own pros and cons. Yes, by doing part-time job, the person gets exposed to the country’s lifestyle, culture, opportunities available, he learns to interact with unknown peers. At an early stage itself, he starts fledgling, he learns to balance finances, time and is able to stand on his own foot. If he is in dilemma with what path he has to take in his career, this might make him clear with his interests. But at the same time, even though it’s a part-time, the student gets tired after the job. Subsequently, the university syllabus requires great attention and dedication as the research progresses and becomes more intense. This creates burden, tension and they fail to maintain equanimity, nor does the part-time job they get hired actually is worth to add up on CV.
If students learn how to cook, do household cores this might cut down the cost of restaurants, maid etc. Similarily, if their grades are good enough universities do offer fully or partially funded courses. Hence, it’s not the sole responsibility of university, parents and government but also the students to be shrewd, avid and take efforts. There’s other way in which this issue could be tackled. A friend of mine took an year drop, did full-time job and thus this revenue buttressed her higher education.
Manifestly from above discussion, the government, parents and schools should take efforts to persuade and support students until they are capable of becoming completely independent. Later on, students have the dexterity to find their acme and hunt the path to reach it themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | sravani mahankali | 50 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Shreya Nuguri | 83 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | atreya98 | 83 | view |
- coastal wetland 55
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 75
- Opportunities do not come to people by luck Instead the most successful people are the ones that are constantly seeking out opportunities 95
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 432, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...could be tackled. A friend of mine took an year drop, did full-time job and thus t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, so, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27625570776 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97390095031 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627853881279 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1832569591 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.045454545 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13636363636 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305195600501 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791079241811 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648589156503 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148752807783 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632440013248 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.