The bar chart illustrates the eating frequency in fast food shops of USA residents over ten years.
Overall, majority of American in both 2003 and 2006 ate in fast food shop once a week while in 2013, liver in USA, mainly, consumed junk food once or twice a month.
In 2003, most people feed fast food weekly for approximately 31% and reached the peak at around 34% in 2006. This pattern followed by people who consumed it for once or twice a month accounted for nearly 30% and 25% in 2003 and 2006, interestingly, got the highest at 34% in 2013. People also tend to consume several times a week for 17%, 20% and 16% in 2003, 2006 and 2013, separately.
The consumption of junk food for few times a year rose to 15% in 2006 compared with 2003 at 12% and the trend kept consistently until 2013. In contrast, the frequency of people who need junk food everyday and never had the same pattern. Both of them declined between 2003 and 2006 and remained unchanged in 2013 with below 5%.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. 61
- the graph show relative price changes for fresh fruit and vegetable, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drink between 1979 and 2009. 11
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... frequency of people who need junk food everyday and never had the same pattern. Both of...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44751381215 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35936831495 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580110497238 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1568814701 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.625 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305840444859 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141633107742 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476528285702 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192816452604 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250009907866 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.