Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that a society’s talents are of paramount importance for the prosperity of the society. As we all know, one way to support talents in a society is to educate them. As it is stated by the author, the government should aid its intelligent students to continue their education. Actually I think that offering free university education would be a great help for poor students, even though it may have some negative effects on other students.
one of the reason I should mention to corroborate my opinion is that providing poor students who are really talented and have been admitted to a university with free education will improve a society educational level. By doing so, more and more students will attend university and as they are interested to study, this free education would result in more professional with thorough knowledge in the job market. Consequently, these people would help the society to thrive. As a case in points, I can example an institution that support top high school students to use its educational services like sample exams for free to get ready for the university entrance exam. I should mention that I know many students who have become top ranks in this exam but they could not afford it if they were not free for them.
The other reason that I think university tuition should be wave for students who can not afford it is that if they are not allowed to attend university for free, they will leave continuing their education because of the money and the society will be deprived from benefiting these talents contribution to its development. In other words, their talent would be wasted due to the money shortage. In our society we have many students who do not continue their study because they don’t have money and they should go to work since the time they are very young. Had they access to free education, they would have prospered in the field they had intelligence in.
Although offering free university education would lead to efficient use of talents in the society, it may also cause discrimination among rich and poor students. rich students who are also talents and are admitted to university may feel being not important as the poor who are provided by free education. this free education just for students who can not afford the university tuition may cause separation between them and other students who have paid for it. it is obvious that students with the same level of intelligence and endeavor, expect their society to offer them the same opportunities like free education for both.
In short, based on the aforementioned reasons it can be concluded that offering free university education would have some advantages and disadvantages, while in my opinion its benefits outweigh its losses. The government should plan to include all the society talents and enhance them by providing them the best opportunities it can and at the same time consider to be fair to all members of the society. For example it can offer a free education for top rank students, no matter if they are poor or rich.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | KarinaShine | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | stevewang1007 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to thinkfor themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government,industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... negative effects on other students. one of the reason I should mention to corro...
^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'waved'?
Suggestion: waved
...at I think university tuition should be wave for students who can not afford it is t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'talents'' or 'talent's'?
Suggestion: talents'; talent's
... will be deprived from benefiting these talents contribution to its development. In oth...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'accessed'.
Suggestion: accessed
... the time they are very young. Had they access to free education, they would have pros...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Rich
...imination among rich and poor students. rich students who are also talents and are a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...oor who are provided by free education. this free education just for students who ca...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, if, may, really, so, while, for example, i think, in short, by and large, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2578.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88257575758 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72282623638 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.407196969697 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 826.2 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2254168411 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.9 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365304021623 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1290086276 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105725410708 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235978612894 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999685248301 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.