the graph below shohs the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in european country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph illustrates the amount of three kinds of the eat consumption (chicken, beef, lamp and fish) which were consumed over 25 years from 1979 to 2004. Units are measured in grams per person per week.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest consumption gram per person per week was chicken while the most negative was beef.
From 1979 to 2004 amount of three kinds of the eat consumption (chicken, beef, lamp and fish) in general movement was fluctuated. With regards to the amount of fish used, it began at around 60 grams and than remained constant. In 1999 falling dramatically considerable less than 50 grams, likewise, approximately 210 grams of beef was eaten in the first years after which the figured fluctuated slightly and dropped rapidly. In the other hand, it was clear that the higher chicken noted 250 grams and beside one of the smallest fish with 40 grams in 1999.
- the pie charts below show the avarage household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 61
- the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 41
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 73
- the two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sector in Canada in 2005 and 2010 78
- the graph below shohs the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in european country between 1979 and 2004. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...llustrates the amount of three kinds of the eat consumption chicken, beef, lamp and fis...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...m 1979 to 2004 amount of three kinds of the eat consumption chicken, beef, lamp and fis...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...h used, it began at around 60 grams and than remained constant. In 1999 falling dram...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, likewise, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77419354839 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42292210127 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593548387097 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1106786335 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139091370507 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740840636556 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865288972449 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103369934217 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596619993571 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.