TPO 18
The critical problem is that a particular species of trees, Torreya, is facing a decline of its population in these years. The author suggests three possible solutions against the decline of Torreya; in contrast, the lecturer casts serious doubts on all of the recovering methods since she believes that none of them are convincing or practical.
On the first place, the reading passage suggests that the declination of Torreya could be eliminated by re-establishing this species in its original living area, Northern Florida. The microclimate in Northern Florida is supposed to be cooler which is suitable for Torreya to have thrived over thousands of years. The professor, in the opposite, claims that the temperature in this specific area is affected by the larger area as well as global warming result in the increase in temperature and also wetland becomes dry. Torreya has limited possibility to survive without the essential microclimate.
The author also provides another view of points that Torreya could be relocated into a further north space. The local cooling weather there is favorable for Torreya. However, the professor seriously argues this argument that migration assisted by humankind because of a previous unexpected example. A once-endangered kind of trees, black lock tree, have been migrated by people and been thriving out of control due to no natural enemies in the new place. More worst, the uncontrollable spread finally threatens native species which of themselves were already endangered. The dangers of unpredictable outcomes caused by human-assisted migration outnumber the benefits.
Finally, the reading passage proposed a solution which scientists can plant Torreya carefully in research centers and monitor them. Nonetheless, the professor contends that the population of Torreya limited by the scale of the research centers does not have enough capacity to protect Torreya from the diseases. Torreya must maintain its high genetic diversity directly related to the number of individuals to resist the diseases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...t, the lecturer casts serious doubts on all of the recovering methods since she believes t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'worst' (without 'More') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: Worst
...to no natural enemies in the new place. More worst, the uncontrollable spread finally thre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, well, in contrast, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51428571429 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90959611614 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606349206349 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2801184381 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454466497954 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143887021437 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897563377627 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254766617286 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920811555667 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.42419426049 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 63.6247240618 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.