The university has provided students who are going to enter university with two summer vacation programmes. Which one do you think is better for students?
1)take some college course in advance of some course that is related to students' major
2) visit some history museums or historical relics
I stand for that universities should give incoming students a taste of pre-courses in summer. Students graduating from high schools are generally confused with several issues related to their future study, and a college-level summer courses give them college-life experience before semester start.
The first aspect to point out is that high school students often not make decision on their majors, and the courses in specific field can help them to figure out their interests. Take my experience on determining my major for example. I have great grades on history in my high school, and I usually thought I can become a historian in future. Before entering the university, my school hold a summer camp for students to experience college life. During the camp, I was aware of my real interest in biology and decided to major in Biomedical Science after series of advanced courses. Hence, my personal experience evident the importance of pre-college courses for incoming students.
Furthermore, a common problem to freshman is how to deal with new classmates in a completely new study environment, and the summer courses can help them to adapt new academic life before the official class. If a freshman cannot get along well with other students at the beginning, he has to counter this frustration in addition to his academic activities. This is a great challenge for a young student. However, taking pre-courses is an opportunity for students to make friends without study pressure. After getting close to other students, they can become study partners and study together. Therefore, the pre-courses are definitely helpful for new students.
In a short word, I can tell from the experience as well as general fact that it is beneficial for incoming students to take summer courses before they getting into college. By gaining this opportunity, they can know what subject they are actually interested in and becoming future major, and find out study partners to study in future. This benefits students and prepares them for better college life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-29 | Albeet | 70 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | Mehrdad.imn | 70 | view |
- TPO 41 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. 3
- 阅读材料Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thu 3
- TPO 50 integrated 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 332, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...sually thought I can become a historian in future. Before entering the university, my sch...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...r, and find out study partners to study in future. This benefits students and prepares th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1656626506 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79617212113 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527108433735 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6250299609 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.882352941 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263755344744 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103421478223 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761722505804 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183421825785 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532314045341 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.