In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
To curtail the problem of traffic congestion, authorities ought to impose tax at increased rate on persons having their own cars, and these extra funds could be utilized to upgrade the public transportation facilities. This can be advantageous and people would buy less cars, but it has drawbacks too.
One of the major benefit is that it will encourage people to use the bus and train services, and they would spend less on purchasing their own cars. By doing this, some extra money could be saved which can be used by people for other activities. Another point in the favour could be less air and noise pollution because number of vehicles will be decreased on the roads, so less emission of harmful gases would take place. To exemplify this, Delhi has adopted a method of driving odd-even number plate cars on the alternative days which has controlled the problem of traffic jams and air pollution to a considerable extent.
On the other hand, more taxes would be collected at initial stage of implementation of such kind of policy afterwards it may start decreasing and at later stage less funds would be available for the improvement of public conveyance facilities. this would interfere in the proper maintainance of these facilities and the standards of these services might go down. Moreover, buses and railways could become overcrowded with the public as more and more people would start using these services.
In conclusion, it might be an effective move to impose heavy taxes on private car owners with motives of curbing the issue of increasing traffic and motivating people to use public buses, metro and trains, but this could cause the problem of overcrowding and fund-raising at later stage.
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’t afford. What are the reasons for this behaviour? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem?” 84
- Some people think that schools are merely turning children into good citizens and workers rather than benefitting them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 58
- Nowadays, some parents pressure their children to be successful. What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Some people think that money is one of the most essential factors in promoting happiness.Do you think people can be happy without much money?What other factors contribute towards happiness? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...an be advantageous and people would buy less cars, but it has drawbacks too. One ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun funds is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...may start decreasing and at later stage less funds would be available for the improv...
^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...vement of public conveyance facilities. this would interfere in the proper maintaina...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0034965035 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70494039273 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552447552448 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6494304766 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.1 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124698946525 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512129715254 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401447182384 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872440202367 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349475256892 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.