With divorce rates and family breakdowns increasing globally, it is generally accepted that families today are not as close as they used to be.
In todays busy lifestyle people often don’t get to spend quality time with their loved ones. This lack of time for each other results into lack of understanding between two individuals resulting into more family breakdown with divorce rates higher than before. This essay will elaborate on this problem followed by a reasoned conclusion
To begin with, there is a large population of working class today than ever before. People are busy running after the success, bounded by their daily monotonous routines that they often forget to spend quality time with their family. More and more families today don’t share healthy discussions and ‘we’ time. In addition to this, the couples are busy chasing their own individual goals, often ignoring the spirit of team work. This different set of priorities among individual set the differences which ultimately results into breakdown of relationship.
Secondly, this new trend can also be attributed to women empowerment. Women now are more financially independent and don’t have to think about the monetary problems once separated. Therefore, this reduction in income disparity between men and women have resulted into more women taking a call on their relationship. Moreover, the ‘divorce’ which was once considered as a taboo in the society is now an accepted norm. People often prefer to walk out of the relationship then to share the burden whole life.
In conclusion, I would like to say that though an individual should not be caged by a broken relationship but an earnest attempt should also be made to give quality time to the other half. The broken relationships result into broken families that is not good for society. People should prioritize families and their needs for better time and care because in the end, everyone needs someone to listen to their complains when they reach home after a long battle on roads and in office.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-31 | Bhawna Sharma | 67 | view |
- Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them However others do not agree Discuss both sides and give your opinion 75
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student. However,there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to work.Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In the letter describe the situati 73
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper, as a result, more adults work at home and children learn at home. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- In many countries, women and men are working full-time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household tasks. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Ordinary people try to copy famous people either reading magazines or watching TV. Why do they do this. Do you think it is a good idea to copy famous people. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s busy lifestyle people often don't get to spend quality time with their lov...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23548387097 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80467314802 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.82372269 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.2 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159435178674 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512144535345 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419802510679 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101181567523 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039191610336 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.