The given column graphs illustrate the proportion of money spent by Norway, Poland and UK on food items in 1998 and 2008.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that the maximum amount spent by three European countries on both nourishment and other type of goods.
With regards to food items, the Norwegians allocated 25% of buying foodstuff which increased dramatically to 45% in 2008. In 1998, only a 8% of money used by Poland but the figures grew significantly to 30% in 2008. 5% of income spent by buyers in 1998 and 25% in 2008.
The maximum amount of other items consumed by poland that was 8% in 1998 but by 2008, the amount of these items rose four fold to 35%. The consumption of other two countries Norway and UK was 8% and 5% in the year 1998 to 20% and 28% in 2008 respectively.
- The line graph below show the population size ,birth and death rate of ENgland and Whales from 1700 to 2000. 67
- The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008. 56
- The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...matically to 45% in 2008. In 1998, only a 8% of money used by Poland but the figu...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 652.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43537414966 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4793095404 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537414965986 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 174.6 283.868780488 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3227123881 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1428571429 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335918298747 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149243159046 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523911963062 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191786152066 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455755236373 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.