Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
In today’s era, waste from homes or at other places has become an alarming subject to ponder because it indirectly has a grim impact on human’s lives, which is utterly erroneous. However, some advocate the view of enforcing laws so that there could be a more augmentation in the recycling process in order to preserve the environment from further damage. Thus, I am going to put forth my views over this statement.
To begin with, waste recycling can be proved to be an effective method in coping with myriad problems, therefore there should be an appropriate law for awaking conscience of people on account of plethora possible reasons. Firstly, people will be more meticulous in dividing the recyclable and non-recyclable wastage due to the concern of the punishment or fine, and thereby they may cooperate in a better way in the recycling process. Secondly, the law can ensure change in the mindset of people because people often procrastinate such issues in the wake of their other works, but with the enforcement of law, they will be more serious and will have more participation. For instance, it has been found that countries like the U.S.A, Canada have strict legislation over the recycling of waste and muck, as a result people strictly abide by the rules,
On the other hand, the law cannot be a viable alternative in making people to have more indulgence in the recycling process owing to multitude reasons. Firstly, issues which are related to the environment can only be tackled with the proper awareness among people about the dire aftermath of, not recycling the waste. In addition, government should ensure pertinent amenities for dumping the waste and by making people to know about the various methods to recycle waste, consequently there can be brought a remarkable change, because mostly people do not show their eagerness due to the lack of facilities for waste.
In conclusion, I opine that environment must be the prime responsibility of every individual because merely government can never bring any fruitful change.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 100
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 80
- Experts say older people were happier and healthier in the past because they did more exercise and spent more time with family and friends, whereas now many suffer loneliness and health problems.What are the causes of this and what are some solutions? 88
- Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your experience. 100
- consumer goods have become the most important part of human lives. do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the wake of their other works, but with enforcement of law, they will be more se...
^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... been found that countries like the U.S.A, Canada have strict legislation over th...
^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...multitude reasons. Firstly, issues which related to the environment can only be t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25903614458 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32948924326 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58734939759 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.1394192356 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.6 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2 20.7667163134 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.1 7.06120827912 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330667569484 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12128008485 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806875129095 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169570399968 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111459368445 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.