Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
Nowadays, the question related to the compulsoriness of non-profit service for society at many high schools, such as: taking part in some volunteer programmes, keeping good relationship with neighbours and guiding children with sport skills has become a heated topic in recent years. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this above view.
The compulsory knowledge of learning about unpaid community service at high school programmes plays an important role in existing critical thinking for students. Apart from gaining understandings of many courses at school, students can also grasp some social skills in non-profitable social activities. For example, students are able to form a comprehensive view of all aspects which is the major element of creating independent and reflective thinking by the mixture of knowledge of society and academic subjects.
Experiencing the healthy and balanced life is one of the significant benefit of unpaid social service programmes at high school for students. Due to the participation of volunteer activities and instruction for younger children with sport skills, pupils may improve their physical characteristics. In addition, having a good relationship with neighbours helps them enhance the psychological skills. Therefore, combining the physical and mental practice is the critical factor on building a wholesome lifestyle for students.
In conclusion, it is necessary for many leaders of Ministry of Education to publish the policy for giving unpaid community service at high school as a compulsory subject. Besides, students also need to practice a variety of soft skills to boost their ability on thinking which is considered as the purpose of getting a promotion on job in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Jass Rai | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Harf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?What other measures do you think might be effective? 93
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). 73
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, therefore, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54339622642 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09968704997 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581132075472 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5322989666 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.545454545 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305978157262 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112144145068 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100971658584 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183868740405 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024803075922 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.