The main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990.
<p style="margin-bottom: 1rem; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249);">The pie charts give information about the proportion of five different sources of energy in the USA: oil, natural gas, coal, hydroelectric power and nuclear power between 1980 and 1990. It is noticeable that the amount of oil-consuming decreased and that of hydroelectric power still maintained. By contrast, there was a significant growth in the amount of coal and nuclear power using as one of the main sources.</p><br style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249);"><p style="margin-bottom: 1rem; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249);">Oil consumption accounted for 42% in 1980. Despite its dramatic decreasing to 33%, oil was still has a good proportion in 1990. The percentage of natural gas-consuming also saw a slight decline but only decreased from 26% to 25%. That of hydroelectric power remained at 5% after ten years.</p><br style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249);"><p style="margin-bottom: 1rem; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249);">On the other hand, the proportion of using nuclear power was similar to the percentage of hydroelectric power in 1980, at exactly 5 percent. This then made up about 10% in 1990 while the rate of coal-using grew from almost a fifth to just under a third.</p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Nina_OY | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | Blackcytrus | view |
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world 73
- The pie chart shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990 78
- The pie chart shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990 36
- Some people think that the government should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- The main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 965.302439024 236% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 313.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.28434504792 4.92477711251 148% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.6616144726 2.65546596893 176% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428115015974 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 283.868780488 198% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 323.122646835 43.030603864 751% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 325.714285714 112.824112599 289% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.7142857143 22.9334400587 195% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0522535034035 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376494228038 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394371723887 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0522535034035 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 35.2 13.2329268293 266% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 9.9 61.2550243902 16% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 10.3012195122 221% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 25.83 11.4140731707 226% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 11.0658536585 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.