The graph below shows the participation of Australian children in sports outside
school hours in 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given column graph compares the percentage of Australian boys and girls who
participated in sports as extra-curricular activity in 2014. It is interesting to note that only 4%
boys and 5% girls did not participate in any sports after school hours.
Swimming was slightly more popular among girls than boys, with about 13% boys and 16%
girls participating in it. By contrast, basketball was minimally more popular among boys
with 8% boys and 7% girls participating in it. Football was most popular among boys with
20% playing football after school hours. Only a small minority (4%) girls played football.
Netball, however, was more popular among girls with 18% playing it and only 2%
boys liked netball. Therefore netball and football show opposing trends between both
genders.
Overall, netball could be labeled as a game for girls and football for boys, according to this
graph. Boys and girls in Australia clearly had different preferences for after school sports
activities
- "Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social andcommercial perspectives.What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reducethese pressures? 84
- The given graph shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in 4 countries.Write a report for a university lecture making comparisons where relevant andreporting the main features. 56
- Children ore focing more pressures nowadays from academic, social,and commercial, perspectives. Whal ore the causes of these pressuresand what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures? 73
- The charts provide information about students in 2007 who were happy with different facilities at a university of UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different material that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country . Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparison where relevant . 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 21, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ing it and only 2% boys liked netball. Therefore netball and football show opposing tren...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32075471698 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71690833818 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0466213843 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.6 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0793794334373 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410932852765 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496364129571 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0432066115425 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425114251126 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.