Social skills play a vital role in any child's future success, without which they will face many problems in their community in order to make communication with other members of society. A group holes the idea that parents should be in charge of mentoring these skills. However, others think school should carry out this inevitable responsibility. To achieve a clear picture, I intend to put this matter into a comparative perspective.
From one point of view, it is believed that a child's guardian should take the major part in this issue. This rather conservative idea implies that father and mother could through their special bot with their little ones teach social behaviors chest to chest. One reason for this claim is that most babies look up to their parents as the first hero of their life. Although the contrasting paradigm states that the parents do not have ample knowledge to make them qualified for this mission, it is countered the notion that school can teach them this know-how. This view gives me the impression that all parents are not capable to handle this huge responsibility.
There are, from another point of view, who claim that school solely have an impeccable credential to create a conducive condition for youngsters to grasp the communication techniques for their future social lives. This group's main observation is that school is the only institutions where is able to maintain an integrated social education, as a result of which it gains devices such as unique instruction method for this to give the students a united social attitude. Those who disagree think that school does not have enough time to spend for each individual child to transmit this kind of insight to them, whereas, this view is dismissed and addressed through the creation of specific time for this mean in school. It strikes me a sophisticated view because integrity is what we need in our social views in our modernized communities.
On balance, it seems to me that the mindset favoring parents responsibility for children's social manners can actually do more harm than good because an effective solution should encompass much more than just an emotional bond.
I am on the convection that little members of our society should intake these skills mainly in school rather than home. Sight must not be lost of this fact that teachers must use the emotional bond potential of parent to escalate the effectiveness of their education. As a result, concerted effort of home and school along the main role of school could be the panacea for this matter.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is to increase the number of sport facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measure are required. 56
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- 52
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'behaviors'' or 'behavior's'?
Suggestion: behaviors'; behavior's
...bot with their little ones teach social behaviors chest to chest. One reason for this cla...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l could be the panacea for this matter.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, look, so, whereas, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 3.15609756098 570% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 57.0 5.60731707317 1017% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 965.302439024 220% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 428.0 196.424390244 218% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96962616822 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 3.73543355544 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65014971635 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 106.607317073 221% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 283.868780488 227% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 1.53170731707 718% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9748782249 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.117647059 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1764705882 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256268324833 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899951289445 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457711885776 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141085268749 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420958159162 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 40.7170731707 253% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.