Bar graph (three categories and 5 different age group)
The bar chart give information about how much money was spent on three basic needs by people from different age group in the UK.
Overall, while expenditure of food & drink and entertainment shared the similar pattern that both increased with age, the money spent on restaurant & hotel followed the opposite trend. Furthermore, as shown by the chart, people spent more money on food & drink than the other 2 categories.
As for under 30 age group, the proportion of expenditure for food & drink and entertainment are nearly equal at about 7% which is only half of the restaurant & hotel spending at approximately 15%.
When citizens in this nation get older, there were upward trends in spending on food & drink. The figures increased gradually throughout the age groups and reached the top of 23% accounted by over-75-year-old people. Similarly, more money for entertainment was set aside as age increased with 23% highest of group aged 60-75. However, the oldest group only have the amount of expenditure allocated equal to a half of the previous group at 12%. In contrast, expenditure on restaurant & hotel decreases gradually with age to only under 5% among the oldest.
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Writing an essay (250 words) about the topic “Challenges of global manager” 78
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that secondary or high school student should be taught money management because it is an important life skill. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 56
- The bar chart below shows percentage of adults of different age groups inthe UK who used the Internet every day from 2003-2006 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, similarly, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10416666667 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8954493047 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0439077416 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218402467074 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937769126555 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848201332662 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143415482213 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994119580451 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.