A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
“Variety leads to upliftment”. It means if someone experiences variety in life, be it in any form, he exposes to enlightenment and upliftment as research has shown that variety makes him to understand the nuances and afford him the opportunity to choose from all available alternatives. However, when it comes to education at school level, it does not produce results as intended. The prompt here, asserts the implementation of same national curriculum for all students until they enter college. In my view, I strongly agree with this policy and would substantiate my view with a cliché: uniformity and consolidation make nation strong. The detail explanation supporting my view is mentioned in the following paragraphs.
First of all, for a nation like India where diversity is inherent in the form of language, culture, food and even education, it is prudent to implement same curriculum to bring in uniformity, since it offers better methods for evaluation and comparison among students. For instance, when students in India vie for few seats in top colleges such as IIT, the research has shown that it is cumbersome for the evaluators to judge the performance of students on a single scale since some schools follow curriculum in their regional language while others pursue in English and language is one of the components that is evaluated for a student’s ability to converse. Further, when some students choose to appear in a written test for not so higher level jobs such as security guard or a clerk due to their economic conditions, it becomes difficult to set a uniform eligibility criteria for a job because some students are graded with higher weightage given to mathematics while others are graded with higher weightage given to language. Therefore, if such a policy is implemented, it would make the comparison among students easier for the evaluators and it would bring all students at one uniform scale.
Secondly, again diversity has its cons with its pros, such as the research has shown that students from two States of India namely UP and Bihar are excellent in mathematics but have limited knowledge of English because of their school curriculum focussed on 6 core courses on mathematics but one course on English. While, in other States such as Delhi, schools make it mandatory for a student to choose 3 courses in English and 3 in Mathematics. Hence, diversity in terms of higher level of mathematics in UP and Bihar produce the excellent students in engineering and physics but due to this diversity they are not able to converse in world’s communication language, i.e., English and thus, outperformed by their Delhi counterparts. Therefore, when these students look for job in India or abroad, their chances of securing a good job is infinitesimal. Further, when the Government of India had implemented skill enhancement programme in 2015, it produced unintended results since the programme was not aligned with all different schools' curriculum but was focussed only on the skill enhancement at national level, i.e., give basic mathematics and English knowledge to all students in India. Therefore, implementing a policy of national curriculum can afford the opportunity to Government to align its national programmes with education and provides basic minimum education and awareness to all students of India.
Thirdly, diversity in education leads to procedural hurdles in reforms and undesirable spending in printing. It means when a nation like India, where education is a subject which comes under Union and State list and where federalism is practised, intends to bring in reform in education system of a State, it faces several challenges in the form of opposition by other elected members of the Government who represent different States since they argue that why the Government is concentrating reforms on only one State. Therefore, bringing in reform in education as per changing times makes the Government procedures unnecessary long and stalled. Further, due to this federal structure and diversity in education, Government spends enormous amount of borrowed money on printing books, periodicals and examination papers since these jobs are required to be completed by their respective State education board. Had it same across India, it would have given the opportunity to Government to print all related material in few locations and get them printed from few large printers and save huge amount of money since economies of scale would have come in. Therefore, national curriculum had advantage in costs saving and is conducive to reforms in education sector.
Of course some may argue that national curriculum distorts the federal structure since it forces legally all States to give in their rights to regulate education and its related subjects. However, the proponents of idea of having different curriculum must understand that nation which is divided in education, which is considered to be the basic right of a person, cannot realise the goal of nationalism and cannot bring in prosperity for its citizen. Therefore, national curriculum in school level education, which is considered the enlightenment and upliftment for all sections of the society, must be implemented.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-10 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
2020-01-10 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
2019-12-29 | Shams Tarek | 62 | view |
2019-12-17 | ali.rs | 50 | view |
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 66
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 66
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria."Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people 69
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper."In our region of Trillura, the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend — the city-run public schools — comes from taxes that each cit 69
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1036, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...amme was not aligned with all different schools curriculum but was focussed only on the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, while, for instance, of course, such as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 136.0 58.6224719101 232% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 38.0 12.9106741573 294% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4415.0 2235.4752809 197% => OK
No of words: 835.0 442.535393258 189% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2874251497 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.37553407148 4.55969084622 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99039925749 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 349.0 215.323595506 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417964071856 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1416.6 704.065955056 201% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.881492991 60.3974514979 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.6 118.986275619 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207416545232 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717136294296 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701526884724 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134519069468 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468079527251 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.8420337079 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 187.0 100.480337079 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.