Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is clear that funding on wild life conservation projects is a subject of extremely debatable topic in recent years because of their effects on human lives. Although some claim threatened species’ lives are not valuable for a huge amount of funding, their extinction definitely affects to our lives as they play a fundamental role in our ecosystem.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why should not spend more money on protecting endangered species. For one reason, extinction process would happen with or without human effects since it is periodically natural process. In fact, as the last extinctions that wiped out all kind of species over the world, including dinosaurs, happened with no human effects, spending time and money on preventing natural disappearance process is totally meaningless. Another reason is funding too much on protecting wild animals negatively impacts to societies. For instance, protecting endangered species comes at the expense of solving human problems especially famines, since it requires a massive amount of money and time while human-related issues are more important.
On the other hand, preserving endangered species is definitely worthwhile thanks to their positive effects on our daily basis. First, conserving biodiversity by protecting these all kinds of species, which ensures human food supply. For example, majority of animals are the irreplaceable factors that are integral to some ecological services, such as pollination and mitigation floods or droughts, which helps to maintain the productivity of agriculture. Second, some plants bestow many benefits with medicinal properties. This means that some health problems, like diseases and cancers, cannot be cured due to lacking of some ingredients used to produce the medicine.
In conclusion, some believe that spending money for saving nearing extinct species is totally unapproved while there are many imperative issues need to be funded, protecting these species is significantly meaningful. By maintaining a healthy ecosystem, standard living conditions could be improved, which contributes to diminishing social problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | Thaonguyen1409 | 96 | view |
- You are applying for a job and you need a letter of reference. Write a letter to a former boss.In your letter:1.Describe the job you are applying for2.Say what you want included in the reference letter3.Request that your former boss send you the letter by 73
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree? 84
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from death health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disag 84
- Art and music are considered some of fundamental of all societies. Do you think art and music still have a place today's modern world of technologies? Should children spend more time learning art and music at school? 89
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what are solutions? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68224299065 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99715026576 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610591900312 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4095699024 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203706377489 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700233539997 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069398766175 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117465275764 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488665061206 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.