By and large, the direcct effect of government's actions, on the society is undeniable. Though the growth of new companies, is tied directly to the economical development that can affect society in various ways. There are a plethora of people who are in the conviction that the government should do so through acts such as more penalty or higher tax and larger fines, in order to reduce their damaging behavior toward envoirnment, while others take a radically different point of view. To the extent that my personal perspective is concerned I accord with first group.Among countless reasons which give adherence to my opinion I will delve into the most important ones in what follows.
Firstly, shutting down the companies which produce indespensable products, that can be benefical for the society in a larger picture, is not an option often. In other hand their destructive effect on environment shall not be neglected. In a long run the environment pollution can endanger the human health and therefor is not matter to be negotiated. Fining these companies in a large scale, can provide enough fundings for the government to minimize their adverse effect on the environment.Take Nishaz company for example. The produced oil was of importance for the country and in some sense even vital. The government was unable to stop the factory from releasing dangerous waste into the wild, and the company owners werent willing to change their production line since they considered it to much expensive. Finally through a substantial fine the government funded the money needed to build a waste managing factory and use it for more that what Nishaz was releasing to theenvironment.
Secondly, fining makes reluctancy toward employing the same trend by other companies. The machine oil production factories for example renewed their production line in 1994, three month after the large fine was aquired from Nishaz by the government.
the companies employed greener attetudes toward the environment and thereby reduced their adverse effect on it.
In short all the aforementioned reasons and explanations come to the conclusion that government must limit the adverse subsequences of factories by posing larger fines on them. The government must oversee the production companies actions , in order to provide a suitable bed for their progress, while minimizing the adverse cansequences of their actions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is much easier for people to achieve success without their family members’ help now than in the past? 90
- 5 Aug: Many companies provide important products or services, but also damage the environment. Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is much easier for people to achieve success without their family members’ help now than in the past? 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... new companies, is tied directly to the economical development that can affect society in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 568, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Among
... is concerned I accord with first group.Among countless reasons which give adherence ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ger the human health and therefor is not matter to be negotiated. Fining these co...
^^
Line 4, column 493, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Take
...their adverse effect on the environment.Take Nishaz company for example. The produce...
^^^^
Line 4, column 722, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...e into the wild, and the company owners werent willing to change their production line...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 794, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...roduction line since they considered it to much expensive. Finally through a subst...
^^
Line 4, column 813, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...e they considered it to much expensive. Finally through a substantial fine the governme...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...ed their production line in 1994, three month after the large fine was aquired from N...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...quired from Nishaz by the government. the companies employed greener attetudes to...
^^^
Line 8, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...oversee the production companies actions , in order to provide a suitable bed for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in short, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31496062992 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90663752584 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561679790026 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2564550078 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5625 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19153439061 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576691684985 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449042902124 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10011650171 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270156697582 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.