The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar chart illustrates the total number of minutes in billions of United Kingdom cellphone calls which divided into three types: local, national and international, mobiles between 1995 and 2002. Overall, local calls remain the most popular, despite a bit of fluctuation, and the other two also show a general increase..
To begin with, the number of local calls started at just over 70 billions of minutes, then shows a gradual increase to 90 between 1995 and 1999, and declined steadily back to the start at roughly 70 billion for the last 3 years. It is also interesting to note that, a similar upward trend can be observed in the total number of minutes of Uk national and international, mobile calls. A steady increase can be seen in the total of domestic and foreign calls rose almost a doubled from approximately 30 to 60 over the period. Whereas, mobile calls stared at the low point at 1 but then went up dramatically to around 45.
If we compare the different types of service in the same year we can see that the huge variation between these three categories around 40 billions of minutes from 1995 to 1990 but from 200 to 2002, the was only a minor variation at under 20. Especially, in 2002 the difference between these kinds of calls dropped to only 10 billions of minutes each.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | rchauhan.micro | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | kulwa | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | Vo My Anh | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 89
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 56
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree with these views? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...e other two also show a general increase.. To begin with, the number of local cal...
^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '70 billion'.
Suggestion: 70 billion
...ber of local calls started at just over 70 billions of minutes, then shows a gradual increase ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '40 billion'.
Suggestion: 40 billion
...n between these three categories around 40 billions of minutes from 1995 to 1990 but from 200 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '10 billion'.
Suggestion: 10 billion
...en these kinds of calls dropped to only 10 billions of minutes each.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67248908297 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60025976615 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585152838428 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7009127095 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365355918514 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14600314013 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101485581391 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243214391681 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065868455254 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.