Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, traffic jams and lack of accommodation have been increasingly popular in urban areas. In order to tackle this problem, some people argue that governments should implement policies that encourage companies to move to rural areas instead of concentrating on majority regions. Although there are some drawbacks of this policy, I believe that these are outweighed by the benefits.
Undoubtedly, there are some disadvantages for the movement of organizations from cities to countries. The major problem is that companies might face the risk of losing their high-quality workforce. It becomes clear that not everyone is willing to settle down in the suburbs where there is the lack of restaurants, shopping centers and public transit vehicles so they would seek another job to maintain their current living standards. Whereas, most people living in the small towns and villages do not sufficient education to undertake intellectual jobs because skilled workers are a rarity in rural areas. Consequently, enterprises might waste their time and money to train their new employees.
Nevertheless, I believe moving business and their facilities to rural areas would be much more beneficial. Firstly, such relocation of companies will cause urban populations to shrink substantially. If cooperations like Samsung offer accommodation to their employees near their workplaces, people from rural areas who work for those companies would no longer have to travel to city centers to work, thus this will relieve pressure on urban housing supply system as well as reducing traffic congestion during rush hours. Secondly, by adopting the policy, the firms could create more job opportunities, boosting the development of deprived areas. For example, countryside dwellers can opt to work in factories with higher pay rather than agricultural work which help them improve their standard of living, thereby paving the way for the growth of national economy.
In conclusion, while I acknowledge that companies could be affected when relocating to less-developed provinces, I believe that the governments should implement this policy because of considerable benefits to our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | trungtrung | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | hplong93 | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tran Xuan Quoc | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | doancuong | 61 | view |
- The chart below show the changes in car ownership in UK between 1961 and 2001 67
- the pie chart below shows the results of a survey in which undergraduate and postgraduate 78
- Many people say that companies, factory owners and privates tour operates should pay the bills for cleaning up pollution, instead of government. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 78
- The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions oftonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shownbelow. Make comparisons where relevant. 67
- the environment problem facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60303030303 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01060415427 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630303030303 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6708368703 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.071428571 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236509140573 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758902819987 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726501491028 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140864777024 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101246235753 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.