Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
The author clams that best way to understand the character of the society is to examine the character of men and women that the society chooses as its heroes. It is true that the role models of any society gives many important information about the society. Though, this claim of the author may seem true, but this does not necessary to be always and everywhere true. Hence, I don't agree with the author on this claim due to following reasons.
To understand any society there are numerous things which we can analyze to identify character of a society so the claim of author that studying role models of a society is the best way is not appropriate. The history of any society, famous literature, and culture are some of the good ways to learn about any society. For instance, North Korea has Dictatorship and the dictator of North Korea is famous for cruelty but still people respect him as they think whatever he does will benefit country and idealize him. So can we assume all the people of North Korea are cruel? There may be some people who dislike the dictator. Hence, the role model may not be representing all the people.
It is true that role models are society's highest ideals. But the problem with this statement is that there may be number of ideals in one society with exactly opposite nature. For example, In India many people idealize Gandhi while there are some section of society who idealize the Godse - the killer of Gandhi. If one will study one of these personality and will make his mind about Indian society then will it be fair? Heroes are worshiped by the people so wrongdoings of any hero in his late life should not form wrong perception about whole society. Can we say that German society has similar characteristics as Hitler?
However, the role models in some amount give information about the society as a general. Take a example of people of Pakistan, they respect their war heroes highly. This makes sense that the people of Pakistan as a society are very nationalistic. It will not be appropriate to ignore this important fact. Though, heroes or ideals may not give all information but they provide some information definitely about the character of the society.
In conclusion, One should study many things like literature, history, and culture in order to understand character of a society. Role models and heroes can not provide all the information necessary to understand any society, in fact relying just on heroes may give wrong perception about a society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the acceptedwisdom of the time 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Some people work for the same organiation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The graph shows the income of four cafes in New York in last year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much important information', 'a good deal of important information'.
Suggestion: much important information; a good deal of important information
...at the role models of any society gives many important information about the society. Though, this claim o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...be always and everywhere true. Hence, I dont agree with the author on this claim due...
^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ety, famous literature, and culture are some of the good ways to learn about any society. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'societys the highest'.
Suggestion: societys the highest
...le. It is true that role models are societys highest ideals. But the problem with this state...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sections'?
Suggestion: sections
...le idealize Gandhi while there are some section of society who idealize the Godse - the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this personality' or 'these personalities'?
Suggestion: this personality; these personalities
...ler of Gandhi. If one will study one of these personality and will make his mind about Indian soc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...on about the society as a general. Take a example of people of Pakistan, they res...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80787037037 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54339736843 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421296296296 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8136628352 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3043478261 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7826086957 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349420985013 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113256535377 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136723131845 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210252749344 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066556093587 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.