The line graph gives information about how much waste was produced by 3 companies from 2000 to 2005.
The line graph gives information about how much waste was produced by 3 companies from 2000 to 2005.
Overall, the amount of produced waste increased in most of the companies in this period except company C. In addition, the figure for company C was highest at the end of the period although it was lowest at the stared point.
The number of rubbish produced of company A stood at 12 tonnes, 4 tonnes higher than that for company B in 2000. The period between from 2000 to 2015 witnessed a sharp decline in the waste of company A from 12 to 8 tonnes. Moreover, 8 tonnes of trash was created by company B in 2000, which slightly grew in 2005, but later steeply decreased to 3 tonnes in 2015.
Regarding to company C, there were 4 tonnes of waste produced in 2000, its amount was 4 tonnes lower than that for company B. However, a significant rise was witnessed in the number created garbage in company C of 6 to 10 tonnes in 2015.
- The table shows the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 and 2009. 61
- Participation by 5 to 14-year-old in selected leisure activities (Australia) 61
- TOPIC: The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010. 61
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to make leather products Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The picture illustrates the university application process. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...sharp decline in the waste of company A from 12 to 8 tonnes. Moreover, 8 tonnes of t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40804597701 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42630174352 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 11.5697612335 43.030603864 27% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500673394083 0.215688989381 232% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264820786725 0.103423049105 256% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.281778162084 0.0843802449381 334% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.41414511307 0.15604864568 265% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.33949097077 0.0819641961636 414% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.