The line graph gives information about how much waste was produced by 3 companies from 2000 to 2005.
The line graph gives information about how much waste was produced by 3 companies from 2000 to 2005.
Overall, the amount of produced waste increased in most of the companies in this period except company C. In addition, the figure for company C was highest at the end of the period although it was lowest at the stared point.
The number of rubbish produced of company A stood at 12 tonnes, 4 tonnes higher than that for company B in 2000. The period between from 2000 to 2015 witnessed a sharp decline in the waste of company A from 12 to 8 tonnes. Moreover, 8 tonnes of trash was created by company B in 2000, which slightly grew in 2005, but later steeply decreased to 3 tonnes in 2015.
Regarding to company C, there were 4 tonnes of waste produced in 2000, its amount was 4 tonnes lower than that for company B. However, a significant rise was witnessed in the number created garbage in company C of 6 to 10 tonnes in 2015.
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things.What is your opinion? 73
- The chart below show the type of transports young people in four countries prefer to use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table shows the number of employees and factories in the UK from 1851 to 1901. 84
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 61
- Nowadays the unemployment rate is on the rise. What are the causes? What can be the solutions? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...sharp decline in the waste of company A from 12 to 8 tonnes. Moreover, 8 tonnes of t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40804597701 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42630174352 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 11.5697612335 43.030603864 27% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500673394083 0.215688989381 232% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264820786725 0.103423049105 256% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.281778162084 0.0843802449381 334% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.41414511307 0.15604864568 265% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.33949097077 0.0819641961636 414% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.