Islip town center now and its planned development
The map shows the Islip town center as it is now and illustrates the proposed changes made to town in the future.
It can be seen that the area will experience drastic changes in terms of both facilities and transportation infrastructure. The most significant change can be found that in construction of a new ring road around the center of the town.
Regarding the transport infrastructure, the current Islip town has a main road connecting the western and the eastern part of the town, along with two paths leading to the school and the park. In the future, however, the main road is planned to be replaced by a dual carriageway which circles around the town center, with a traffic-free road running through the middle of it.
Regarding the town facilities, currently there are two rows of shops running both sides of the main road. While the one to the north of residential will be replaced by a bus station, a shopping center, a car park and a new residential area, the one to the south is expected to remain unchanged. In addition, the park is within reach of the housing area will be reduced in size to make the way more houses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-25 | khuekhue | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | BIBHU KALITA | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | WAFA | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | Marita | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-01 | Sukchain appur 56 | 73 | view |
- The media should include more stories which report good news rather than bad news To what extent you agree or disagree 66
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income. Unfortunately, tourism can also be a source of problem if it is not managed correctly. Do you think that benefits of tourisms outweight its drawbacks? 61
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 78
- The diagram shows the consumption of renewable energy in the USA from 1949-2008. 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64532019704 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78062127805 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532019704433 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6640150556 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255231426601 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112265089767 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109554857842 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176748389495 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120454903506 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.