Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce these increasing levels of crime.
To what extent to you agree or disagree?
A number of countries have been experiencing difficulties to ameliorate the culminating crime rate. A substantial number of people opine that increased law enforcement agents on the streets is the only saviour to degenerate these phenomenon. In my opinion, I am not entirely convinced with the statement as I do believe a fragile socio-economic stance is the main obstacle to minimise these problems.
To begin, the law enforcement body is dubbed with the sign to combat criminal offences. People are generally afraid of police because the police, who are appalling in appearance, has the supreme authority to exercise laws to the miscreants, which is the main reason some people think why availability of police on streets could lessen the crime. But this is not efficacious in general as it really work to some extent. For exponent, drug trafficking and drug taking are two sorts of criminal offences and the criminals are from different backgrounds. Police can control tangible movement of drugs, but they would not hinder drug taker from consuming drugs, which will lead the drug business perpetually as this problem is intangible that urge the society to solve it implicitly.
However, recruiting more policies on streets will not solve the increasing rate of crime; there are several socio-economic lackings need to reconstruction to control these problems. First and foremost, poverty is one of the most important catalyst that lure innocent people to commit crimes. For instance, dwellers of slums in the large cities frequently do burglary as they don't find any suitable jobs to sustain their lives. Secondly, unevenly distribution of wealth is also a reason to increase crime. Because not only rich people are becoming more richer but also trading contrabands products by illegal means, which is totally beyond the control of so called police. So by developing infrastructures for the poor to engage with economic activity and establishing equally wealth distribution law can actually reduce the crime.
To conclude, I believe that increasing police on the streets will definitely help to reduce the rate of crime to some extent, but an improved socio-economic system will contribute more to lessen the rate of crime.
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce these increasing levels of crime.To what extent to you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment? 56
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answ 89
- 2014 World Food Consumption 2014WorldFoodConsumption 85
- Some believe that people should not continue to work once they reach the age of retirement.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your experience 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this phenomenon' or 'these phenomena', 'these phenomenons'?
Suggestion: this phenomenon; these phenomena; these phenomenons
...reets is the only saviour to degenerate these phenomenon. In my opinion, I am not entirely convi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'works'?
Suggestion: works
...not efficacious in general as it really work to some extent. For exponent, drug traf...
^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e cities frequently do burglary as they dont find any suitable jobs to sustain thei...
^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lary as they dont find any suitable jobs to sustain their lives. Secondly, uneven...
^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'richer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: richer
...cause not only rich people are becoming more richer but also trading contrabands products b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in general, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28370786517 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95221779136 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4924293709 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334772716674 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101845164914 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898845648018 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215099468962 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748174904955 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.