With the rapid advancement of communication technology such as smart
phones, tablets and other mobile devices, some people believe that the disadvantages
outweigh the advantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern age, the advent and popularity of cutting-edge communication technology is often accompanied by major impacts on how people interact with one another, which induce a controversial debate of whether the benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. From my viewpoint, I advocate this idea.
In the positive aspect, as powerful facilitator of communication, mobile devices have empowered people to conveniently keep in touch with friends and relatives eliminating distance barriers between communicators. For example, communication devices enable users to make a phone call, send messages, make phone calls and video call with others. In addition, thanks to the technological development of communication devices, people are connected not only nationwide but also in a global network. Interaction devices with Internet provides people abundance of opportunities to know people of diverse backgrounds and personalities. Compared to the past, human’s way of transmitting information and interaction has been revolutionized by cutting-edge communication technology.
However, the negative side of this phenomenon should be paid more attention. Initially, there would be a high chance of people’s over-reliance on technology advancement of communication devices. This will cause the ineffectiveness in communication among individuals in real life when people are too engrossed in tablets or mobile phones. Moreover, most digital devices nowadays have games and appealing applications installed which can cause addiction to people when they cannot refrain from the virtual life on the screens. For example, in 2017 with the release of the game Pokémon Go, many casualties were recorded since people were unaware of surroundings while playing this game.
In conclusion, the merits of communication technology are undeniable however, due to its negative influence on people’s interacting habit I believe drawbacks would eclipse the benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | Gagan Cheema | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung | 89 | view |
- describe line graph 11
- The bar chart below shows percentage of adults of different age groups inthe UK who used the Internet every day from 2003-2006 84
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ 56
- the table below shows the amount of waste production in 6 different countries over a 20-year period. 56
- The bar chart below shows percentage of adults of different age groups inthe UK who used the Internet every day from 2003-2006 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96453900709 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45428660812 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6550454787 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.384615385 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207068990198 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726507750672 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525838145081 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119799381843 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258142071184 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.