The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart provides the two year comparison of the percentages of the visitors to the various social networking website in Canada, in the years 2014 and 2015.
In general, almost a quarter of the population did not attend any of the given sites at all, whereas, a single one site has attracted most of the visitors in both years.
A closer look clearly finds big disparity among the visitors of One site having the greatest share well above 25% to Five sites which even did not attain quarter of that figure. Hence, leaving the One site undoubtedly the top most attraction for surfers.
Moreover, almost equal share was attended by the Two site in both of these years, nonetheless, visits to these sites were a bit higher in 2015 than the previous year by 1%.
On the other hand, other sites i.e. Three, Four and Five in205 collectively made equal proportion to the One site, with 28% in the year 2015, and even could not make half of the percentage of visitors to the One site.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Shivam7090 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Sagar Gurung | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | phanduydat | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Prison is the only truly effective form of punishment because it separates criminals from society 85
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 61
- Many people today are worried about young children using video games. What problems might these games cause, for children and society as a whole? How could these problems be reduced? 72
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, whereas, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58426966292 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35161855636 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4538965624 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 5.23603664747 267% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142037042868 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770964190098 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538182298352 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876472760516 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534964191001 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.