Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?
It is often argued that whether we use or not the nuclear technology for the effective purpose. I completely agree with this viewpoint. Firstly, this essay will discuss the use of this technology in power generation or construction purpose and secondly, discuss how it can benefit humans.
There is no denying that nuclear technology has so many uses for the humans life. By the use of this technique, we can generate more power so that there will be no shortage of power in all the area around the globe. We can use this technology in the medical field to do research and operation with much clarity. As this is so dangerous to use but If we use it safely for the good cause then we can be benefited from it. For example , In Russia , the major power production is through nuclear power plants and there is abundance of power in that country which they distribute to nearby smaller nations. So, if we use this high tech with proper protection then we can get the major benefits from this.
Another reason why this technology is suitable is because by this technology there is not any harm to the environment if we dispose its waste properly. So if we continue to use this engineering in generation or in medical field then our surroundings can be safe for the long time. For instance, Harvard university research states that the major cause of air pollution is ashes or fumes discharge from the thermal power plant which ruins our environment and people affected with lung diseases. If we use nuclear plants for power generation then people can get the clean air as there is no air pollution.
Agglomerating all the facts, I would like to ingeminate that nuclear mechanization have so many benefits for all the humans and environment if we use it with proper protection and procedures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | sat_8808 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | samgautam007 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | Manpreet1809 | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-29 | mifas meleraroth | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-29 | Laxman Basyal | 56 | view |
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings?What is your viewpoint on this issue? 73
- Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes? 73
- Foreign tourist abroad should be charged more than local people to visit a country’s cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Write at least 250 words 73
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What are the causes of this problem? What solutions can you suggest? 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ear technology has so many uses for the humans life. By the use of this technique, we ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...we can be benefited from it. For example , In Russia , the major power production ...
^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nefited from it. For example , In Russia , the major power production is through n...
^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y distribute to nearby smaller nations. So, if we use this high tech with proper prote...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73801916933 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67518292431 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460063897764 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3820516531 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.928571429 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242885541377 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110555543133 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690501769164 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168876912557 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473461111972 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.