Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
By looking at the history of people’s friendship, it is understandable that failure comes from how people make a group of friend and the number of group member. I emphatically believe that we should make a small group and hold it for long time when it comes to friendship in order to maintain happiness. I have at least three reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First, having a limited number of member in our friend’s group is beneficial in this way that we can scrutinize all individuals comfortable which brings us happiness. To elaborate, determining member’s character and trait through thin and thick is away to find a trustable person and understand authenticity of a companionship which is available with maintaining a small group over long-time. A research conducted by a famous university in psychology admitted that a long-lasting relationship stems from small number of members that in turn result in gratitude and joyfulness. As an explicit example is my cycle of friendship with three close friends. Once, we made a decision to elongate this cycle by adding new friends. The result was not mouthful and made our relationship weakening because new members was not trustworthy and sowed seed of discontent and dissatisfaction in our group. Accordance to that tough experience, we came up with a fact that we should stay in our basic structure of our friendship and never let a new person to run into our group.
Second, in a small group, managing group is easy, and establishing a law to follow for all members based on voting and consulting is available which gains us gladness and comfort. Furthermore, making conformity in a community in which there is a few members is easier than a new large group. Researches have shown that all small group have been able to make an adorable contract in a long run studying. As I mentioned in the last paragraph, as we enhanced the number of our friends in the group, we could not make a permanent decision, so that we started to build a rule to cultivate somewhat peaceful in the group’s atmosphere. The thing happened was a deficit of consensus to make a commitment owe to present new persons in the group. Thanks to turn our decision out in order to make large community, we could find our happiness and calmness again.
In conclusion, building a friendship in a small group and keep it in a long run is beneficial and along with gladness. Not only can we examine genuineness of our members, but also are we able to make a rule with which all member have agreement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- rights of animal 73
- What are advantages and disadvantages of storing information in electronic devices? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...urn result in gratitude and joyfulness. As an explicit example is my cycle of frie...
^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of friendship with three close friends. Once, we made a decision to elongate this cy...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, look, second, so, then, at least, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86136363636 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03345584093 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481818181818 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1119300243 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.833333333 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194979941904 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751380431412 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439694007619 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145315375325 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270420098241 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.