History is a unique subject which links us with the past times of humanity. Therefore, it is essential to study our ancestors’ historical experience by adding it to curricula of educational institutions. Some people believe that this must be deleted from school program because many students do not feel motivated to study it. However, I strongly believe that learning history is necessary for new generations and there are negative consequences of not doing so.
Studying other historical periods gives insights into different ways to life. For example, students can investigate how people lived in ancient times, such as Ancient Greece or Ancient China. As a result, they have an opportunity to compare those lifestyles with ones societies experience nowadays. Therefore, we start appreciating their contribution to various life aspects we encounter these days. More importantly, learning about conflicts in the past can teach us how to avoid them in the future. For example, students may study preconditions of wars, such as World War I and II. Consequently, new generations would be aware of ways to prevent similar situations happening in societies today. Therefore, this will help to maintain the peaceful well-being of citizens at a regional or global scale as it is a priority of any country.
Regarding consequences of excluding history from taught programs, it would mean that there is no reference and background for other subjects. Since all subjects rooted in history, pupils can presumably lose interest in other subjects, given that there is no explanation for the creation and development of things in different subjects. Furthermore, another consequence is that the history of the countries would be forgotten. This will lead to decreasing the sense of pride and patriotism for their own country amid citizens. For instance, athletes could become less ambitious and motivated in Olympic games and other tournaments due to the absence of these basic senses.
In conclusion, even though for some individuals it is seemingly losing its meaning, I personally believe that history is still and even more significant for many reasons and its exclusion will result in apparent losses to the entire education. It is also suggested that history lessons should contain various activities to encourage children’s interest in it deliberately.
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 78
- The bar chart below shows the production of the world’s oil in OPEC and non-OPEC countries.Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 86
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tunity to compare those lifestyles with ones societies experience nowadays. Therefor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4375 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05309887624 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595108695652 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7961564981 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.315789474 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204668859152 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551936246688 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406127405382 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118780776774 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385362784115 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.