TPO 33
In fact, both the passage and the lecture discuss about carved stone ball found at a number of locations in Scotland. There are many hypothesizes that illustrate aims and meaning of stone balls. The passage expresses three theories; however, the lecturer disagrees with the proposed claims and rejects them by holding convincing reasons.
First, the passage mentions considering the shape of the balls some researchers believe that these stone balls have used as fighting or hunting equipment; nonetheless, the lecturer doesn't reinforce that hypothesis by emphasizing that the stone balls weren't damaged; therefore, they didn't weapon.
Next, as the passage claimed, some people according to the identical shape of spherical stones think they were used for measuring the weight of grain or other food; actually, they were a standard scale in trade. The lecturer doesn't support the passage idea by adding the different density of stones. Although, the size of stones is approximately equal, the weight of them directly depends on type of stones used for producing.
Finally, as indicated by the passage regarding to stones intricate design, the round balls made from stone presumably was used as a hierarchal symbol in society; however, the lecturer rejects that by asking questions about location of stones after dyeing; in other words, lecturer mentioned the claim that stones balls haven't found in grave or cemetery in order to confirm the third idea
- TPO 53 Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a nu 97
- educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking web sites 76
- integrated essay from TPO 16 85
- TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task 83
- t which annihilated many species. However, finding all ideas questionable and implausible, the professor in the listening by estroyed the food chains of species which lived on the coast. Conversely, the professor disputes this point by clarifiying the fac 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ng equipment; nonetheless, the lecturer doesnt reinforce that hypothesis by emphasizin...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...sis by emphasizing that the stone balls werent damaged; therefore, they didnt weapon. ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e balls werent damaged; therefore, they didnt weapon. Next, as the passage claimed...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...a standard scale in trade. The lecturer doesnt support the passage idea by adding the ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...r mentioned the claim that stones balls havent found in grave or cemetery in order to ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, third, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36086956522 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58280265704 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578260869565 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.973828593 49.2860985944 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.125 110.228320801 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06452816374 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435731305386 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185689154334 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113440668792 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269007414453 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294772672688 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.3589403974 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.