In many countries, mainly tourists, but not local people visit museums and historical sites. Why does this happen and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Undoubtedly, mostly visitors but not native people visit art galleries and historical places in certain nations. this essay intends to explain why this is happening and put forward some remedies for this menace.
There are myriad reasons associated with this notion. Firstly, today more and more people have a hectic schedule due to the overload work level, thus they do not have much time to visit museums in their leisure time. Secondly, many people commute to historical sites many times, so that they only prefer to travel to some places which are far from their home. Hence, it can lead to a negative impact on people and the country as well. For example, if the majority of people visit museums or historical places more than five times, then they get bored to travel the same place in their city, therefore local people do not visit nearby museums in their life. Lastly, as the technology has been woven people lives, it becomes a negative influence on humanity, owing to they prefer to use communication devices to get knowledge about distinctive art galleries instead of going to historical sites.
Moving further, there are also some solutions to overcome this problem. As the law enforcement agencies reconstructed all types of historical places with the help of modern technology, it may help to attract a local person to go to the museum for enhancing their insight about science and technology. Additionally, if the government also pay less for the entrance of historical sites, also poverty-stricken people start to visit such places for spending their spare time. In britain, the statistics revealed from many survey that 60% out of 100% of people travel to the museums on weekends in fact that the authorities of britain update all material day-by-day, that is why personal prefer to visit historical places in their nation. Consequently, all these solutions can be solved this problem and the development of every country would increase.
To sum up, although local people are not interested to visit local art galleries because they already explored all things related to the museum. Yet, believe that as government offers decent amenities in historical sites, then it would attract the people to visit such places.
- In many countries, mainly tourists, but not local people visit museums and historical sites. Why does this happen and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 73
- Government argue that the population of children should control through taxes. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Young people prefer listening to music rather than listening to the news on the radio Is this positive or a negative trend provide reasons and examples for your opinion 69
- The graphs below shows four categories of cities fruits ant the top three countries to which these were exported in 2012. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d historical places in certain nations. this essay intends to explain why this is ha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun survey seems to be countable; consider using: 'many surveys'.
Suggestion: many surveys
...n britain, the statistics revealed from many survey that 60% out of 100% of people travel t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1222826087 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62904062722 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527173913043 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5635321538 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436273894206 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140036681929 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681746971774 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276119939283 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337073912618 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.