museums and historical sites are omnipresent in many countries, and conventional a country's tourist attractions. There is a common belief that these places are only the attraction for visitors not local residents. I contend that the principal reasons for this tendency are the loss of people's interest and the entrance fee, which can be addressed by some feasible measures I mentioned further below.
To begin with, I argue that indigenous people may find museums and historical places in their local area less attractive due to the familiarity. Local people are those who nearly remember and observed all the sites in their city many times from the ordinary places to the well-known ones as museums and historical relics which are normally a ideal destination for tourists, therefore, the majority of regional people are likely to take little interested in these kinds of places. They will have the propensity for allocating their time for the hectic schedules and other impressive entertainment centers, The another possible reason seems to be the entrance fee. Many dwellers certainly do not pay money for a place that they have already been to inasmuch as they deem that it is a extravagance.
There are, in my opinion, a number of approaches to solve this problem. The first one is refurbishing the appearance and quality of museums and ancient places by adding new displays or upgrading some parts of inside areas. Museums should contribute to promoting different aspects or themes and displaying more attractive objects in the exhibition. Furthermore, the managers of museums and historical sites are able to adjust the price for entrance more reasonable for local residents, such as costing them a half of the actual fee. This will probably incentivize more local people, especially undergraduate who want to accrue information for their assignments about history.
In the final analysis, all the aforementioned data has laid a concrete foundation that it is roughly difficult to attract more residents come to museums and historical sites. However, there still some possible solutions can be implemented to incentivize the visit of local people.
- The line graph and the bar chart give the information and forecast about the vehicle numbers and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 84
- In many countries mainly tourists but not local people visit museums and historical sites Why does this happen and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 78
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Museums
museums and historical sites are omnipresent in...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd historical relics which are normally a ideal destination for tourists, therefo...
^
Line 2, column 780, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...een to inasmuch as they deem that it is a extravagance. There are, in my opinio...
^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd quality of museums and ancient places by adding new displays or upgrading some...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27325581395 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90122687164 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3397269886 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362600892401 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118528704288 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677855455254 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223066612813 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043599661976 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.