working four days a week
Both reading passage and lectures explaining about four days work pros and cons. The reading passage holds the idea that working four days a week would be beneficial for both individual and company, even in society. However, lecturer is not agree with the statement. He further explained why he did not agree with reading passage by providing specific points.
First of all, the reading passage states that by scheduling four working days, company will save more money because salary will decrease by 80% also by hiring more labor, over-timing payment might be eliminated. In contrast, lecturer dismissed the statement that adding new workers will require more cost for their healthcare, office space and computer.
Secondly, by working less days, employees will work more efficient and feel more rested at work as well as there will be less error at work-space. Nevertheless, lecturer holds strike statement with passage. He says that for individuals, there will be more work pressure because company will expect same result as working in five days.
Lastly, as mentioned in reading passage, by working few days a week, individual will live more happy by spending more time with their family or spending more time for themselves. Regardless, lecturer declare that earning less money could lead economic crisis and might decrease their quality of live. Moreover, chance of improving career will decrease and even they might loose their job in economic depression.
In sum, from the begging to the end lecturer refuted the statement mentioned in reading passage by giving reasonable explanation and examples.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-03 | linda0012 | 60 | view |
| 2020-11-20 | Adnane1998 | 70 | view |
| 2020-07-25 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
| 2020-07-02 | Saara | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | dew2222 | 80 | view |
- It is the responsibility of the government to provide health care to everyone living in that country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- working four days a week 80
- The diagram below shows an automatic photo booth Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is always better to study with a teacher then it is to study alone Support your response with reasons and examples 53
- 80.Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and provide relevant examples from your own experience. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...en in society. However, lecturer is not agree with the statement. He further explaine...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ace and computer. Secondly, by working less days, employees will work more efficien...
^^^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...areer will decrease and even they might loose their job in economic depression. In s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, in contrast, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.296875 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53871391838 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55078125 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.43259758 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261041854665 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964788301647 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123307335647 0.0662205650399 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132040217722 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100608653962 0.0443174109184 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.