The bar diagram indicates the changes in number of male and female candidates in higher education, over a period of 20 years, in Britain. The graph clearly shows the significant changes in the trend of further education. However, all the time, among both the genders people preferred part-time studies.
Overall, the number of men pursuing higher education remain almost change whereas that of women change greatly. Over time, men started preferring full-time education and therefore the reduction in the part-time male students was approximately compensated by the full-time male students.
A steady growth in the number of female students can be observed both in part-time and full-time students indicating that more women have come into higher education. The number of women in part-time education is increased very sharply, reaching almost 11 lakhs from 7 lakhs during the peroid of 1970 to 1991.
However, the number of full-time students is rising for both genders.
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 84
- Recycling proportion from 1982 to 2010 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with? 73
- Learning english at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English. Should we try to ensure the survival of local l 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41176470588 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69591799879 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6843385905 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308203956825 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138843518279 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546560229653 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198028058056 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477605592814 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.