With the increased global demand for oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources. To what extent do you agree?
The consumption of fuel has witnessed an exponential rise due to an ever-increasing population and an increase in industrial productions. This thirst to get more fuel to satisfy the demand has led some people to argue that the search for fuel should now extend to the undiscovered territories. I strongly disapprove of this idea and this essay will first discuss the drawbacks of such actions, secondly the alternative ways to meet the demand; followed by a reasoned conclusion.
To begin with, the greed of humans to exploit nature to meet their requirements is not new. We have successfully destroyed the flora and fauna of most accessible parts of the world and now an urge to venture into areas that remained untouched is pernicious. The human’s activity to maraud the nature will not only disturb the tranquillity of these places but will also endanger its inhabitants. For instance, there has been a growing clamour, for oil and gas companies to discover natural reserves in Alaska and Greenland. These remote parts of the world are already fighting the adverse effects of global warming and now the human landing for oil will only make the situation grow grim whose adverse effects will be felt throughout the world.
However, one cannot allow the reduction in the supply of oil and gas to derail the economies. Dealing with this requires governments to invest more in alternative sources of energy. Moreover, the supply of fossil fuel is limited and would not last a century. This lingering threat to the end of fuel supply has already triggered the search for alternative sources of energy. Consequently, many developed countries are already switching to biodegradable fuels. The need of the hour is to preserve nature while developing ways to replace the use of fossil fuel with clean sources of energy.
To conclude, the exploitation of nature for human greed should stop. The landing of humans in these secluded areas would threaten the biodiversity of these places and would only deteriorate the ecological balance further. The time is ripe to search for alternatives for fuels before the last drop ends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-08 | krvchanakya | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-02 | amrita123_ | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | manshu_d | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | Jaskaran Kaur | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-21 | harrypottar316 | 76 | view |
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.What is your opinion about this? 73
- With internet improvements, people can share views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is this a good or a bad thing? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference.Write a letter to a former teacher. In your letter:give details of the jobexplain why it is important to yousuggest what information your teacher could put in the reference 78
- Some believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high level degree. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- In many countries, people have health problems because they choose to live in unhealthy ways. What do you think the reasons for this and how can it be solved? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09142857143 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83491352494 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534285714286 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4441718118 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.823529412 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191915219198 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055507836878 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041958189046 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104567228451 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302652821143 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.