Bar Chart : the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The bar chart represents the spending of the UK and France on consumer goods in 2010. The different groups of objects are: cars, computers, books, perfume and cameras.
The two countries spent a lot of money in cars: about 400,000 pounds France and 450,000 the UK. It could be related to the fact that this type of object is more expensive than the others. At the second place there were computers, with an amount of money similar between the two countries. At the last position we can see the perfume, with an expenditure which is higher for France. This could be connected to the fact that a lot of producer of cologne are French. Another important sector is that of the books. The difference between the UK and France is high like in the case of cameras, where the difference is about 200,000 pounds.
In conclusion, the expenditure of the two countries on consumer goods are similar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | kheth | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | phungnguyen1611 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Mattia95 | 61 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of million years. 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...puters, books, perfume and cameras. The two countries spent a lot of money in c...
^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun producer seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of producers'.
Suggestion: a lot of producers
...his could be connected to the fact that a lot of producer of cologne are French. Another importan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69426751592 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49588894814 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.2986338288 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.7 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216745064973 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916335481155 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146707738229 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226331734487 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128329618224 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.